Behind the SAT-Optional Movement: Context and Controversy

The SAT has been a cornerstone of college admissions for decades, but through the 2000’s, and beyond, its role as the ultimate gatekeeper to higher education was challenged by a powerful movement. With increasing criticism about its fairness and bias, particularly against marginalized groups, a growing number of institutions moved toward test-optional policies. These changes aim to make the admissions process more equitable, but are they truly leveling the playing field or creating new challenges?

Through the lens of early adopters like Bowdoin and Bates College, Jonathan P. Epstein explores the motivations behind the movement, the impact on student diversity, and the controversy it stirred in the enrollment community.

This impressive research article was awarded the NACAC Journal of College Admission’s 2010 John B. Muir Editor Award, which recognizes the author who has made the most significant contribution to the Journal during the past year.

Curious about the future of college admissions?

Download the full article to explore the deeper implications of the SAT-optional trend.